Comparing Ultrasonic Vapor Degreasing to Basic Ultrasonic Cleaning Tanks

Ultrasonic Cleaning Options

All ultrasonic cleaning options are not the same – in this blog we will review the advantages and disadvantages of using an Ultrasonic Vapor Degreaser (UVD) system versus a Basic Ultrasonic immersion Tank (BUT).

All ultrasonic cleaning options are not the same – and when it comes to part cleanliness, overall operational costs and worker safety, Ultrasonic Vapor Degreasing (UVD) vs. basic ultrasonic tank utilization (BUT) – ultrasonic vapor degreasing wins hands down. In this blog we will review the advantages and disadvantages of using an ultrasonic vapor degreaser (UVD) system versus a basic ultrasonic immersion tank (BUT).

Ultrasonic Vapor Degreasing (UVD)

An ultrasonic vapor degreaser heats a non-flammable solvent to a vapor form - providing multiple cleaning operations within one system: vapor, immersion and ultrasonic immersion. Parts can initially be cleaned in the vapor and then immersed in the ultrasonic bath. The parts are always immersed in clean solvent that has been contained in the system and distilled.
Key benefit: consistent part cleanliness. Key Limitation: Higher Initial Cost

Basic Ultrasonic Tank (BUT)

A Basic Ultrasonic Tank is a tank outfitted with ultrasonics that uses solvent or detergent water to clean parts. Overtime the bath gets dirty and requires routine bath change outs to ensure parts are as clean over time as when the bath is fresh.
Key benefit: Lower initial cost. Key Limitation: Progressively dirtier bath can mean inconsistent part cleanliness.

Ultrasonic Vapor Degreasing (UVD)

A vapor degreaser heats a non-flammable solvent to vapor form. Parts can initially be cleaned in the vapor and then immersed in the ultrasonic bath. The parts are always immersed in clean solvent that has been contained in the system and distilled


KEY Advantages:

  • Part Cleanliness: Parts are immersed in clean solvent every time; therefore, recontamination is not an issue.
  • Solvent Containment: Cooling coils keep the solvent in the tank reducing solvent loss and emissions.
  • Worker Safety: Minimal interaction with solvent as parts come out clean and dry and there is cool containment zone.
  • Reduced maintenance Solvent constantly distilling, significantly reducing bath change-outs.

    KEY Disadvantages:

    • Initial cost


Basic Ultrasonic Tank (BUT)

With a basic ultrasonic tank, parts are dipped into the ultrasonic bath to clean them. Over time, the solvent bath gets dirtier and dirtier - risking recontamination onto the parts. Additionally, there is no solvent containment thus the solvent is lost into the air and operators are exposed to the solvent.


KEY Advantages:

  • Cheaper start-up cost – the initial price is quite economical.
  • Cleaning Agent: use this tank with solvents or detergents & water
  • Simple to Use.

    KEY Disadvantages:
    • More Bath Maintenance Required
    • Part cleanliness reduces as immersion tank gets dirtier.
    • No Solvent containment
    • More solvent exposure for workers
    • Increased solvent costs
    • No Safety controls

Ultrasonic vapor degreasers are an excellent option for parts that have blind holes, tight cavitation, and/or solidified contaminant. Reliance manufactures a complete line of Ultrasonic Vapor Degreasing Systems uniquely designed for:

  • Power, Lots of Power - Power level adjustment and frequency sweep modulation to tailor the ultrasonics for maximum efficiency in cleaning your parts

  • Flexibility - easy to add additional KHz

  • Field Maintenance Ease - Easy field replacement of basic components

  • Efficient Parts Processing - Ultrasonic cleaning cavitation enhances the cleaning process outperforming conventional hand scrubbing or dipping

  • Fast and Cost Effective Cleaning - Ultrasonics get the dirt out fast reducing cycle time and increasing throughput

Conclusion

Basic part cleaning can be accomplished with a Basic Ultrasonic Unit (BUT). The simple and effective cleaning with the lower initial cost profile is compelling. However, the many advantages provided by Ultrasonic Vapor Degreasing (including but not limited to) part cleanliness, reduced maintenance and overall simplicity makes Ultrasonic Vapor Degreasing (UVD) the better long term choice.

_______________________________________

Give us a call or contact us to discuss your parts cleaning needs and how ultrasonic vapor degreasing might be an option for you. We can test clean parts in our ultrasonic degreasing system and share our recommendations for optimized cleaning.

At Reliance, we take a comprehensive, systemic approach to supporting our customers to finding solution to their cleaning needs. Reliance Technical Support Department at 847-640-8923. We are glad to be of assistance. 

Previous
Previous

Novec Supplies Are Dwindling…AeroTron-100 is a direct replacement - available now!

Next
Next

Your Vapor Degreaser needs to be NESHAP Compliant if Using nPB

Reliance Specialty Products, Inc.
154 Easy Street
Carol Stream, IL 60188
847.640.8923

© by Reliance Specialty Products, Inc.
All Rights Reserved

Comparision of Ultrasonic Degreaser Options

Ultrasonic Vapor Degreasing (UVD)

VS

Basic Ultrasonic Tank (BUT)

Exceptional. Parts are consistently clean very time because bath constantly refreshing itself via distillation

PART CLEANLINESS

Diminishes as bath gets dirty, and dirtier.

Cooling Coils Keep Solvent in Tank

SOLVENT
CONTAINMENT

None

Not Needed

RINSING—DRYING

Required

Minimal – partial solvent change out needed infrequently.

BATH MAINTENANCE

Significant - frequent bath change out to reduce contaminants and maintaining detergent & water balance

Variable with Adjustable power & sweep.
Field replaceable

ULTRASONIC POWER

Variable. Sometimes Adjustable.
Not field replaceable

Yes

SPRAY WAND

No

Yes

FILTRATION

Not Usually

Yes

SAFETY CONTROLS

No

Comprehensive Indicators for system conditions.

CONTROL PANEL
INDICATORS

Minimal Indicator Lights

Slide Lid = increased solvent containment

LID

Lift off Lid = solvent drag out loss

Initial cost – Higher

Long term - Minimal

COST

Initial cost – Lower

Long term - Higher